Other interesting comments from the Contribution section. Information about our services.


Unfortunately, the historians very poorly research the XIX Century colonization but it is well established the fact that in Banat existed even a consistent foreign colonization process in the first half of the XIX Century [mainly in Banater Bergland area]. In the 1820's, 11 new villages will be raised -colonized manly with czech, and pemi- in Banater Bergland; among them are the villages of Garana/Wolfsberg, Brebu Nou/Weidental, Lindenfeld which were set-up in the Semenic Mountains/Banater Bergland by pemi [ie germans] from Bohemia [mainly wood cutters].

In today's South romanian Banat [on Danube, between Moldova Nova and Orsova] are several czech's villages in the Bigar Region settled also during the 1820's by czech-speaking peasants from Bohemia. On Luistxo Fernandez Web Site you can find a list of the czech villages in today Romania.

At the middle of XIX Century, on the StEG domain -mainly in Resita and Anina/Steierdorf- will be colonized also czech's and slovaks [but also italian and french laborers; in Resita existed even a "Franzosen Gasse" (ie the French Street)].

Between the colonization of the Banat's Plaines and the colonization in Banater Bergland were some big differences; for example the colonization of Banater Bergland was more a continuos process during the time then a periodical process like the colonization of Banat's Plaines which was made in waves.

At the beginning of the XIX Century [starting ~1805 up to 1850], the "contracting" villages  [villages raised upon a settlement or colonization contract; in romanian language "sate contractualiste"] are setup. These villages were raised upon internal migration in Banat's area and could be categorized as individual colonization. There were 41 such villages in Banat [in Torontal and Timis Counties]; among them: Mailat, Cheglevici, Covaci, Sanpetru Mic, Sanmihai, Rauti, Sandra, Uihei, Brestea, Sannmihaiu German, Ernsthausen, etc. These villages were mainly tobacco cultivator's villages. Each inhabitant of these villages was forced to grow tobacco on 3[or 4] Joch of land and half of the harvest being delivered to the tobacco monopoly. The settlement contract, concluded between the owner of the estate [private owner or state owner] and the settlers, was based on a 30 year lease agreement [named PACHVERTRAG]. From Lisa Flassak's "Ernsthausen Heimatbuch", we know something about how these villages were raised up: "To a completed residence, in the Ernsthausen case, was included 24 Joch of farmland broken into 8 Joch of winter pasture, 8 Joch of summer pasture and 8 Joch of fallow land; in addition 6 Joch of meadow and 3 Joch of pasture land. A tithe was to have been paid amounting to Metzen [a dry measure, especially for grain] and eight Metzen of oats or Kurkuruz. The privileges of liquor-licenses, selling of meat, fishery, mill-tax, hunting, Ziegelschlag and other crown regalia remained an exclusive right of the rulers".

Starting the 1860's, when the villages were organized on a administrative autonomy basis, the possible advantages given to the colonists were lessen drastically.

Between 1880-1890 only 10 new villages are raised [there is not more available land]: 6 in Caraş-Severin County, 3 in Timiş and only one in Torontal County. After 1900 only one hamlet will be raised: Sosdea Noua/Waldau in Timis County [founded between 1908-1909]. In 1910 the hamlet had 54 houses and more than 300 inhabitants. In 1965 this hamlet will be abandoned.

NOTE: In the near future, this comment will be enriched with new aspects and examples.